Apache Kafka vs RabbitMQ – When to Use What

Published: May 2025

Kafka vs RabbitMQ — The Best Message Queue Explained

Core Difference (1-sentence explanation)

RabbitMQ is a traditional message broker, optimized for low-latency message delivery, complex routing, and per-message guarantees.

Kafka is a distributed event streaming platform, optimized for high-throughput, log-based, durable event storage and replay.

Use-Case Difference

RabbitMQ (Best for real-time messaging)

Kafka (Best for streaming + big data)

Feature-by-Feature Comparison

1. Throughput

Kafka wins — Designed for 1–10 million messages/sec.

RabbitMQ does about 50–200k/sec depending on persistence.

2. Latency

RabbitMQ wins — Often <1ms.

Kafka is typically 5–10ms latency.

3. Message Ordering

RabbitMQ: per-queue

Kafka: per-partition

👉 Kafka is more predictable for large-scale ordering.

4. Durability

Kafka stores data for days, weeks, or forever.

RabbitMQ stores messages temporarily (queues are not durable storage).

5. Retry / Dead Letter

RabbitMQ has native DLQ, TTL, retry strategies.

Kafka requires custom retry topics.

Which is the Best Message Queue?

Best for Microservices → RabbitMQ

You need:

RabbitMQ is the best.

Best for Streaming & Analytics → Kafka

You need:

Kafka is the best.

Rule of Thumb

Use RabbitMQ for communication.

Use Kafka for data streaming.

🔍 Concrete Examples

RabbitMQ used in:

Kafka used in:

Final Verdict

There is no absolute "best".

RabbitMQ = best message broker

Kafka = best event streaming platform

When to Use Microservices

When to Use Event-Driven Architecture Use EDA when: